Limiting Identity to a Confined Box: Transliteration of Critical Analysis Final Reflection

Journey of Creation

The journey in my selfie creation was a unique experience that really challenged my thought process and 

perspective when it comes to identity. The new generation of technology that we have entered is very 

fresh and exciting, though it is also important to not get too carried away in its power that it can hold over 

our own autonomy. I solely used the program Artbreeder for my digital selfie creation, as it was relatively 

simple to grasp the concept of, though results would vary in consistency and accuracy. The biggest 

 challenge I was faced with, were the physical descriptions of my appearance. I have never had to 

describe  myself in such detail, which made it difficult to articulate myself in such a way. I overcame this 

challenge by simply having to accept the fact that no outcome that was spit out, would ever truly 

represent me or my identity. I did not save the original prompt I used for my final image, though I did my 

best to recreate it whilst exploring some of the elements that I struggled with. You simply can not reduce 

your identity to a prompt box.

 
Figure 1 (Artbreeder, 2026) 

Self-Representation and Identity

    There are certain aspects that align with my physical-world identity, though I would say that most do 

not. The beauty of human existence lies in the uniqueness of every individual on this planet. No one is 

truly identical, and no one is perfect. The airbrush look of AI currently portrays humans in an uncanny

 way. Social media as a whole has caused many problems in relation to self esteem, with many feeling the

 need to display their best and upmost self. This creates a sort of identity performance, and it seems like 

artificial intelligence takes after this, making people look as perfect as possible. Though many platforms

 started off as a casual corner of the internet where many would post mundane pictures to share a glimpse 

into everyday life, this soon changed, especially after celebrities got involved in having an online 

presence. The commodification of oneself is a concept that has transcended famous people posting brand 

deals, as now we have regular people treating their online persona solely as a way to garner attention, or even

money, thus came the birth of the social media influencer. The lines become blurred between what is real

and what is not in the digital world.

 

 

                                                         Figure 2 (Holmes, 2004)

Ethical and Cultural Dimensions

Artifical intelligence ‘learns’ from human datasets, not to say that it is a perfect translation of 

human norms and values, but in many ways it is. One glaring example of this is AI viewing 

whiteness as the ‘default’ character. In my experimenting, I would type in various broad prompts, 

along the lines of; ‘man with ___.’ Every result was of a white man. For my own selfie, I likely did

 not have to add ‘white’ to my description, as it is reasonable to believe that it would default to that

 anyway. With AI, there are so many harmful portrayals of race that perpetuate many real-world 

stereotypes, and I’m sure many struggled in their selfie creation with this aspect taken into 

account.  Collective narratives are central to the human condition (Chubb & Cowling, 2022), it 

becomes our responsibility to reconstruct what the collective narrative is. 

 

 

Figure 3 (Artbreeder, 2026)

Gender is another ethical consideration with artificial intelligence, as it perpetuates hegemonic 

views of gender roles in society. This became quite clear as typing in doctor, I got a white male. 

But then typing in nurse, I got a white woman. This exact same thing happened with ‘Professor’ 

being portrayed as a white man and ‘Teacher’ being portrayed as a white woman. These are very 

prevalent stereotypes still today in our society, so with the rampant use of technologies that 

have adopted said stereotypes, is immensely harmful. However, this does open the floor to modes

 of resistance,  which reminds me of the #ILookLikeAnEngineer movement, that aimed to 

counteract gender stereotypes through an identity hashtag movement (Liu et al., 2017). It is quite  

possible that similar movements may take place with the growing presence of AI.  


 

Figure 4 (Artbreeder, 2026) 

 

Transliteracy Reflection

    This diverse way of sharing our reflections added a very interesting component to this process. The blog

 

 post format as a medium can affect the message portrayal in many ways. For one, it can feel like less of a

 

 formal academic setting. It makes it feel like a true reflection of my experiences, making my response 

 

seem less  calculated, and perhaps more honest. Though I would say that the formatting added an extra 

 

challenge to the assignment. Despite that, I believe that these alternate modes of communication are 

 

immensely important in expanding our transliteracy skills. 

 

 References

Artbreeder (2026)  https://www.artbreeder.com/ 

Chubb, J., Reed, D. & Cowling, P.(2022). Expert views about missing AI narratives: 

is there an AI story crisis?. AI & Soc. https://doi-org.login.ezproxy.library.ualberta.ca/10.1007/s00146-022-01548-2

Holmes, Leonard. (2004). Beyond Learnerism: Learning, Practices, Emergent Identity.  

https://www.researchgate.net/figure/dentity-practice-model-of-performance_fig1_374388665  

Liu, F., Ford, D., Parnin, C., & Dabbish, L. (2017). Selfies as social movements.  

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 1(CSCW), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3134707 

 


Comments